#Difference between omnifocus and pro archive#
#Difference between omnifocus and pro code#
#Difference between omnifocus and pro professional#
#Difference between omnifocus and pro mac#

I created the following projects (inside the MacStories folder): New Apps, Accounting, Posts and Tasks.

And, an action typically has a context, the physical reality required for the action to be accomplished.įirst of all, I created some folders: folders don’t interfere with the processing system of the application, as they’re just a way to keep everything well sorted out and uncluttered. On one hand, a single atomic task – called, in OmniFocus, an action – is usually part of a project: it is a step along the way to accomplishment of a larger goal. The GTD mentality relies upon a multi-dimensional classification of each task. Even simpler, let’s talk about how I managed to organize MacStories’ tasks within the Omnifocus’ structure. Also, you can group this stuff all together into a folder. On the other hand, tasks related by certain circumstances should be assigned a context.

A project (pretty much like in Things) is a container of tasks related by content. Also, the sidebar is the first place where you can understand the basic differences between Projects, Contexts and Folders. The sidebar in OF is somehow lifesaving, as it basically organizes all my work stuff in a single and quite narrow pane. To better get the hang of this, we should take a trip into the interface of Omnifocus and one of the most important parts of the UI, the sidebar. Understanding the difference between processed and unprocessed actions in Omnifocus is the key to productivity. Of course, links inserted in the notes of an action will be clickable, and this is just perfect to save interesting pages from the internet which can eventually become tasks. If there’s no description at all the icon is grayed out. An action can have a title and a description (or, notes) and, by default, Omnifocus hides the description field which can be revealed by clicking on the paperclip icon next to the action. At least, that’s my way of using it and I’m pretty fine with it. By “processing” Omnifocus means that you take an action and assign it to a context, a project and give it a start / due date. The main screen of Omnifocus is the Inbox, the place where you’ll dump actions (tasks) that haven’t been processed yet. First, you have to consider that Omnifocus is based on Projects, Actions and Contexts at its core everything else is simply built on this foundation. Calm down, focus and let’s see how this thing works. The first approach to Omnifocus may be a little confusing: the interface is packed with stuff, the toolbar is populated by tons of icons and it’s menus, menus, menus everywhere. Omnifocus offers all of these features and so much more.

#Difference between omnifocus and pro archive#

For those who still don’t know what Getting Things Done is (and perhaps have lived under a giant rock for the past 5 years), it’s a method created by David Allen which lets you add tasks, process them, review them, complete them and archive them. It offers so many features, possibilities and ways to get things done that it’s easy to get lost at first, but if you just give it the benefit of the doubt and delve deeper into the system, you’ll realize that maybe you haven’t really tried the GTD method at all before.

Omnifocus is one of those applications you can mold into your own app.

Turns out Sync is only one of the features that made me switch, as I found way more than simple over the air sync in Omnifocus. So I decided to try Omnifocus again, and here we are today.

#Difference between omnifocus and pro code#

And if you’re a Things user, you should know that’s not possible, though Cultured Code promises it will come soon with an update.

#Difference between omnifocus and pro mac#

Indeed, I came to a point where I needed to sync my Things database between the Mac and the iPhone not only within my local network, I desperately needed to access my tasks while on the go. It doesn’t get almost anything wrong in any section, it could be the perfect GTD application, but – sadly – it’s not. I went for Things, as you may have read in my review some weeks ago. Many people suggested Omnifocus from the Omnigroup, and many told me to give a spin to Things, the new kid on the block from CulturedCode, which featured a clean design and a very streamlined interface.

#Difference between omnifocus and pro professional#

I remember when I started using my Mac in a professional context, I went around asking for “the best application” to manage tasks on a Mac.